So Part 1 of my story starts at week 10, after rupturing my Achilles tendon back in August. My life has been so turned upside down, that I have only just realised I should blog this.
I bust my Achilles tendon on a running track in August, overloaded it when doing a series of standing start hurdles and sprint starts. I won’t go into what it felt like when it blew in this post, but it’s still very fresh in my mind.
Diagnosed in A and E later that night (yep 5 hours of waiting) which is hard enough on your own but my partner and two young children were in tow and we were miles from the place we were staying.
Plaster cast applied to entire lower leg that night with foot in a strong downward point, toes poking out. Next day I saw the orthopaedic surgeon, who advised conservative treatment programme. This I think should also be called the low cost option for the NHS compared to surgery. Back then I was cross and felt perhaps cost considerations were outweighing my long term prognosis, whatever the surgeon said the evidence suggests (similar success rates for surgery versus conservative treatment), but now as you’ll read below I don’t feel like this.
So skipping forward over the last two months of, well, is there a word for it? I’m now at 10 weeks and walking again reasonably ok, but still in a brace boot.
The boot comes after the 6 weeks or so in plaster cast. The boot keeps your ankle at a mostly 90 degree position. When I came out of the plaster cast at 6.5 weeks, the plaster technician felt the active range of motion (AROM) of my ankle was ok enough for me to progress into the brace boot with a 2cm block rather than the usual 4cm block.
The 1st week of attempting to walk in the boot was very weird. The whole leg from hip down needed to re-learn how to walk. I could shuffle so it wasn’t like starting from nothing, but it was a shock just how much capability had withered away.
I’ve been moving around in the boot for 3 weeks and day by day been doing more walking practice. Not been going crazy, I’ve been keeping it low key, but making a careful effort to move around more like usual.
Week 1 in the brace boot (for me this was week 7 of the Achilles recovery programme) was double crutches, and just putting a little bit of body weight on the bad leg, a quarter or less at a guess. Enough to get the leg engaged in having to shift some load but not too much to ring alarm bells.
Week 2 in the brace boot (week 8) things speeding up, have dumped the bad-side crutch, not entirely, but more often than not. I’m automatically walking around the kitchen and even upstairs, keeping a careful track on the hand rail because the boot prevents normal ankle movement which is a killer for falling backwards when going up or down stairs! Leg strength is still really shaky, the quads and glutes are really weak, but I can make them work better now.
Week 3 in the brace boot (week 9 – 10) feeling ok to walk around for much of the day at home, and in the office where I do a mostly sit down job, without any crutches. I cannot do anything heavy with my upper body though. For those doing physical jobs requiring moving loads or anything needing strength, you just can’t do it without putting scary and probably very unwise pressures on the recovering Achilles area, even if you try to protect that area. I tried doing some small DIY jobs at home, sawing through a worktop made me realise that you need your whole body to be safe to do jobs like that and I wasn’t, so I haven’t done stuff that I wanted to do.
To conclude this post (I will post some more seeing as it is the biggest life event for years since having children) the recovering area on my bad leg feels very different from the good leg. When I first came out of the plaster cast, the bad foot and lower leg felt waxy, hard, like it was inflated with some solid wax, with bone structure just about feelable, but the skin was more like skin over marble than over my leg!
The hot bath that night was bliss though! This is the best bath one can ever have surely (apart from those recovering from worse things of course).
Gradually, over the last few weeks, my bad leg has started to feel more like my leg again, can even feel the veins beneath the skin on the top of my foot. However, the Achilles area is still buried in a kind of hard scar tissue, surrounding the recovering tendon. The tendon itself is feelable as a ridge along the hard tissue. I think it is just starting (at week 10 now) to feel a tiny bit more tendon like, but it is still a huge bar of tissue and nowhere near the normal tendon dimensions.
Next post I’ll talk a bit about what I’m able to do with my bad leg, what it feels like, and also start on the whole business of my experience using NHS services. The good and the bad, quite a lot of disappointingly dis-organised service, amongst good things too.
If you can see these images (not me) an example of the British Radio Ap on Android as sighted people see it and how I hear it using Talkback. Visually the icons show the radio stations on offer. For people like me using Talkback you just get random numbers and buttons.
This is a major Android ap issue and This ap is one in a long line of aps I’ve had to uninstall because it is useless to me without labelled buttons.
So big thanks to iheni posting on the technical solution today Alternatives on Android I hope developers will realise how labelling buttons is a really good idea.
I’ve posted on this idea before but something has pinged me into posting on it again: my best guess view on this is that eyes are going to get fixed before inaccessibility design for three main reasons:
1. Average: in terms of eyesight “a company can design their digital services or products to fit an average” sort of user but by definition any sort of eyesight impairment means you aren’t average and will have one or more requirements which cannot be built in. Universal design is the accessibility industries pipe dream because no single design can flex to everyone’s variable needs, but they can make money out of the possibility! However, medical industries are coming at it the other way, they are developing treatments that attempt to return those non-average functioning parts of our bodies back to average.
2. Profits: overall I’m more convinced profits can be made by the pharmaceutical companies in creating sellable treatments, funded by tax payers, that preserve or repair eyesight, than the ability of digital companies to gain sufficient profits from new disabled customers to offset the cost of inclusive design.
3. Hearts and minds: ” average is normal, it’s easier and more efficient” and this applies to all sorts of dynamics so this paragraph is a bit long! The only way any of us really find joy in our lives is when we understand and have a sense of control over the world around us whether that is physical, social and emotional. Self-awareness of an impairment to any part of our bodies or minds is extremely difficult to learn to enjoy or feel is right, because society has a powerful negative bias and defines it is wrong. Yes some people live and thrive and stand out from the average, often those inspirational people and always the ones who are public advocates for inclusive design, but the average disabled person doesn’t. So I think the average disabled person, underneath any external image of pride and confidence with their own body, knows that anything that helps them return an average level of performance to the part of their body that is not working averagely, is preferable to waiting for society (that is every ap and website designer) to build in fully inclusive functionality. Individually speaking they won’t use equality laws, they won’t complain but they will remain reliant on others to make up the deficit, that’s the daily grind. That is why even the hint of a medical fix to an impairment gets disabled people, their family, friends and all those journalists so excited, for slightly different reasons. On the supply side, a partly accessible website hasn’t got a hope of creating any excitement in anyone. There is no positive incentive inside a company to invest enough to deliver real inclusion, the drivers are mainly about limiting risk of legal problems, but hardly anyone uses the law anyway so this risk is not strong and probably weakening. . The business model has never been proved to make any sense either. It is often stated that disabled people have a combined spending power of £80 billion, ready money for any company to get its hands on by making a few accessibility adjustments, but this figure has been promoted for years and years, and it seems to me the cost of designing everything to work with every kind of disability and impairment would cost in the orders of magnitude higher. Having said this, has anyone actually costed what making society accessible would cost and what the economic benefit would be?
just a quick opinion thing about using Google Docs and Google Drive on my Android, eyes-free of course. It’s so close to being literally amazing, but the bugs and glitches with it let it down much more than if it was the usual mediocre attempt at accessibility that is the norm. So close but not close enough to land the prize of being the best document reading, creating and sharing solution since sliced bread… (erm, notice a slight idiom breakdown there…)
I’ll post some specifics soon on this..
Without doubt the new accessible information standard 1605 announced last Friday by NHS England is THE biggest public sector thing to happen to accessible information over the last decade and I think will have a much bigger impact than the accessible information bits specified in the Equality Act 2010. Sad to say I don’t think the Equality Act 2010 really changed any games, maybe it set a new rule, but few followed them and even fewer have used the law to secure their rights. 1605 secures the right for you and inspections will be carried out by the Care Quality Commission, saving blind people from having to take on cases themselves.
For the record the two other big game changers are what Apple and what Google have done by embedding accessibility into their smartphones, tablets and computers for free. Anyone who can use these devices has a drastically reduced need for transcription services or special alternative format provisions because the device can speak or make a large print version on-the-fly, importantly, of the mainstream message, email, document or web page that the company or service produces as standard for everyone else. It’s a win win business strategy because it brings the blind person into the mainstream.
New NHS standard effectively brings blind people into the mainstream too and should be a win win as well.
Interestingly I just got an “innovation alert” emailed to me from HP, the printer company, and like usual I don’t have time to watch (in my case listen) to the video, it’s probably not accessibly text described anyway, but I started to imagine what the alert might contain…
Video imagery starts with rapid fire shots of conventional laser jet printers spewing out laser sharp print outs, but then images slow down, focusing on lots of people’s hands, touching, shaping, building things, building lovely things, building amazing things…
Soundtrack is of a low toned and tensely confident American sounding woman saying- “At HP we are bored of trying to exceed the ever finer and finer detail and ever richer and richer colours that everyone else in the printing industry focuses on.
To be honest, printed imagery could be made even sharper and more colourful, but is this really what people want?
We are also pretty bored of two dimensional images and with fleecing people with the cost of expensive and polluting inks and toners, so we’ve decided to leap into a new world.
We’ve decided the thing that makes human beings so special is our amazing sense of touch, of physical interaction with the world and with the idea of turning ideas in our heads into real touchable objects. Yes yes that is just 3D printing, nothing new in that, yes it’s cool but no it’s not enough for an innovation alert…
So what is enough for an innovation alert? What is big enough for an HP innovation alert? Well, here it is: our new range of 3D printers aren’t printers at all, they are beautiful wireless robots, the most dexterous sculptors you can ever meet, download your design, touch go on Robo-angelo, sit back and watch while the new generation of sculptors create your design, on concrete, on wood, on plastic, on food, on anything, what you can imagine Robo-Angelo can shape up for you to touch…”
Ar I’ve just spent longer writing this than if I’d watched the video. I wonder if the video does actually say this….!